Tag Archives: Minority owned

Creating an Evacuation Plan

Posted on by
Twitt

Properly created evacuation plans will account for a number of potential emergency conditions. These conditions should be both internal and external, and should consider OSHA Standard 1910.36 and Standard 1910.37. These standards guide you in creating the actual evacuation plan and in maintaining the evacuation routes. Simply pointing employees to the nearest exit will not suffice in a true emergency.

Standard 1910.36 specifically discusses the design and construction requirements for exit routes. This standard covers the number of exits required, the number of paths to said exits which are required, the types of exit doors which must be used, and what types of materials must be used in the construction of exit doors and routes. Based upon your facility and your needs, this standard can help you to ensure you create a truly effective evacuation plan.

Standard 1910.37 discusses the maintenance, safeguards, and operational features for exit routes. This standard sets the guidelines for maintaining the routes established in the evacuation plan. It covers everything from lighting and paint to door maintenance and what to do in the event construction is being done to the evacuation route. So where Standard 1910.36 will help you establish your evacuation plan on paper, Standard 1910.37 will help you to maintain these evacuation routes in the event of a real emergency.

If you have not recently reviewed your evacuation plan or if you do not have a true plan in place, it might be time to have a qualified third party firm review your plans. If you have any questions about evacuation plan reviews or creating a new evacuation plan, please contact us. If you have anything to add about creating an effective evacuation plan, please leave a comment.

Creating Effective Lockout Tagout Procedures

Posted on by
Twitt

Creating effective lockout tagout procedures is more of an art than a science. You need to be able to effectively navigate OSHA Standard 1910.147; properly audit your machinery, taking all potential variables into account; create a coherent procedure with this information; and account for future business and regulatory changes. And if you do all of this correctly, your procedures are only good for the time in which your business remains exactly the same; once one variable changes, the procedures need to be updated to reflect the change.

Because of the difficulties with creating effective lockout tagout procedures, most employers rely on qualified third party lockout tagout specialists to create their procedures. A qualified individual who dedicates himself to understanding the lockout tagout regulations can easily assess most facilities and create unique procedures based upon that facility’s needs relatively quickly.

In addition, a qualified lockout tagout specialist will create procedures which account for change. There will be room for change built into the procedures and a plan will be in place for how to account for those changes. Changes can be accounted for in a number of ways, but ensuring there is some plan in place is crucial when hiring a lockout tagout specialist to assist you in creating your procedures.

If you have any questions pertaining to the creation of effective lockout tagout procedures or updating lockout tagout procedures, please contact us. If you have anything to add about the importance of devising a plan for change in lockout tagout procedures, please leave a comment.

OSHA Considering Extending Crane Operator Certification Requirements

Posted on by
Twitt

On August 9, 2010, the Occupational Safety and Health Administration issued a final standard in relation to cranes and derricks used in construction work. This standard established new requirements for crane operators working on construction sites. In order to meet these new requirements, crane operators would be required to meet one of four certification or qualification requirements by Nov. 10, 2014. OSHA is now looking to extend that date by 3 years to Nov. 10, 2017.

OSHA has proposed this rule change in order to appropriately and effectively respond to inquiries and complaints lodged by several parties. OSHA does not want a rule change to go in effect while the rule change is still being discussed and does not want to create a negative impact upon the construction industry. There have already been three stakeholder meetings on this issue, and the final date to submit comments on the rule change is March 12, 2014.

What this means for you, is that if your company uses cranes or derricks, you need to keep a close eye on this situation. If you have not already scheduled your crane operators for certification, it is still a good idea to get that process started, as this rule change has not yet been approved. And even if the extension is passed, these operators will still need to be certified in 2017.

If you would like more information on how this rule specifically impacts you and your business, please contact us. And if you have anything to add about the new crane operator certification requirements, please leave a comment.

Compressed Gases

Posted on by
Twitt

Compressed gases are utilized across many industries. These gases can come in all types, and can be held in containers of all sizes. For this reason, it can be difficult for a company to properly develop a safety plan pertaining to compressed gases and their storage.

Because of this inherent difficulty, OSHA created Standard 1910.101, which sets minimum requirements for the use, transportation, and storage of compressed gases. In addition, this standard sets guidelines for safety relief devices which must be included on the compressed gas containers.

Unfortunately, OSHA largely hands the issue off to the Department of Transportation and the Compressed Gas Association. For issues pertaining to the storage, transportation, and use of compressed gases, business owners are sent to the Department of Transportation’s Hazardous Materials Regulation (49 CFR parts 171-179 and 14 CFR part 103). This regulation, in turn, covers all hazardous materials, and requires cross-referencing for different compressed gases and different containers.

OSHA then directs readers to the Compressed Gas Association Pamphlets S-1.1-1963 and 1965 addenda and S-1.2-1963 for any questions pertaining to the required safety relief devices for compressed gas containers.

So to initially establish a compressed gases safety program, you must review multiple sources. Then, to ensure continued compliance, you must continually review these multiple sources.

To streamline that process, it is often easier to simply work with a third party occupational safety and health auditing firm which can keep you abreast of regulatory changes while helping to ensure your safety plan is compliant.

For more information on compressed gas storage, use, or transit, please contact us. If you have anything else to add about compressed gases or their related regulations, please leave a comment.

Effective Lockout Tagout (LOTO) Monitoring

Posted on by
Twitt

If you have ever had to create lockout tagout procedures for your company, you know that there are a number of ways to do this. If you have any experience in the field, you can do it yourself, you can do it with the help of online quick guides, you can do it as a partnership with a qualified third party firm, or you can hire a firm to handle the whole process for you. And while each of these options have their benefits and pitfalls, each has a subset of companies for which it makes sense.

The same could be said for lockout tagout monitoring. After effective lockout tagout procedures have been created, it is important for regular and ongoing monitoring of those procedures to ensure they remain accurate, applicable, and up to code. Some companies utilize their safety and health team to monitor their procedures, others hire third parties to handle that responsibilities, and still others form a partnership with a lockout tagout auditing firm to jointly monitor and update their lockout tagout procedures.

And while each of these methods can be right for the right company, it is important to look into every option available to you, especially the option which allows you to partner with an experienced lockout tagout firm. Through our Factory Solutions Software, you have full control over your procedures, allowing you to customize and update your procedures in real time, but also allowing us to oversee your procedures, and guide you when needed.

If you have any questions about how to effectively monitor your lockout tagout procedures or about our Factory Solutions Software, please contact us. If you have anything to add about effective lockout tagout monitoring, please leave a comment.

OSHA Fines Solvay Specialty Polymers $77,000

Posted on by
Twitt

On February 6, 2014, the Occupational Safety and Health Administration cited Solvay Specialty Polymers for 12 violations, and proposed $77,000 in fines for said violations. These violations centered around exposing workers to chemical hazards from solvents and came after an investigation of the company’s plant in Marietta, Ohio.

“The plant needs to ensure all equipment and processes receive the proper evaluation and scrutiny before the use of these highly hazardous chemicals. Workers must be trained to handle these chemicals safely,” said Deborah Zubaty, OSHA’s area director in Columbus. “Process safety management programs are designed to prevent the catastrophic release of highly hazardous chemicals and to prevent workers from being exposed to these harmful chemicals.”

Eleven serious and one repeat violation were issued. The repeat violation was issued for failing to follow recognized good engineering practices. The eleven serious violations were all related to OSHA’s Process Safety Management Standard. The Process Safety Management Standard is a detailed set of requirements and procedures which address hazards that are associated with hazardous chemicals.

If you own a company that uses hazardous chemicals and you have not recently ensured you are up to code with the safety management standard, it might be a good time to have your safety and health management system audited by a professional third party auditing firm. OSHA is constantly auditing companies, searching for violations; third party audits can go a long way in protecting your company.

If you have any questions about OSHA’s Process Safety Management Standard or about third party audits, please contact us. If you have anything to add about either of these topics, please leave a comment.

OSHA Compliant Signs and Safety Signs

Posted on by
Twitt

Signs, safety signs, and safety visuals are the cornerstone of a good safety plan. Compliant signage which is properly maintained is both the first and last line of defense against most potential hazards in a facility. They are a constant reminder to employees of dangers and they serve as a warning of potential dangers to any persons in a hazardous area who do not normally work in that area. And when signage is not properly maintained, it can give people a false sense of security that there are no hazards in the area.

Unfortunately, keeping up with signage is more difficult than it sounds. First, you have to cross reference OSHA Standard 1910.145, which governs safety signs, with the standards associated with the potential hazard, to ensure the sign in place is adequate and properly placed. Next, you need to have a plan in place to routinely review your active signage to ensure it is not damaged and has not been removed. If the signage has been removed or damaged, it will obviously need to be replaced. Finally, you need to keep an eye on the regulations, to ensure your sign requirements do not change. Should there be a regulatory update, it could create a situation where some or all of your signs are no longer compliant.

To help you with these challenges, Premier Factory Safety has a sign store where you can customize any sign or safety visual to your required specifications. In addition, we offer facility auditing services to help ensure your current signs are still compliant.

If you have any questions about a safety sign or visual in your facility, or about signs and visuals in general, please contact us. And if you have anything to add about safety signs and safety visuals, please leave a comment.

Creating Lockout Tagout (LOTO) Procedures

Posted on by
Twitt

Anyone who owns or manages a company which deals with machinery that is covered by OSHA Standard 1910.147, which is the lockout tagout standard, can tell you how difficult it is to initially create lockout tagout procedures. The standard is difficult to read, the shortcut material available is often inaccurate or vague, and any inaccuracies in the procedures can lead to serious workplace injuries or even death. For these reasons, many owners ultimately hire a professional firm to help in creating those lockout tagout procedures. The feeling for most is that the small upfront expense is worth protecting the company from OSHA, and its employees from serious harm.

Unfortunately, there are many, many occupational safety and health auditing firms which claim to have the ability to help these business owners. And we have had more than a few instances where we were brought in to fix a problem created by a competitor. So to help you avoid that potential problem in the beginning, make sure to do your due diligence and thoroughly vet the prospective company, including the auditor who will be coming to help you. Make sure the auditor can answer questions about your facility, about lockout tagout in general, and about how best to prepare for potential future changes. And if you sense any hesitation or that anything is amiss, it is probably a good idea to find someone else.

If you have any questions about creating lockout tagout procedures, or about vetting a potential lockout tagout auditing firm, please contact us. If you have anything to add about creating lockout tagout procedures, please leave a comment.

MFA Fined $91,000 by OSHA for 13 Serious Violations

Posted on by
Twitt

A worker was fatally injured on August 26 at an Aurora-based Milling plant in Aurora, Missouri which is owned by MFA, Inc. Following the tragedy, OSHA inspected the facility and found 13 serious violations, including several relating to the death of the employee. OSHA has proposed fines in the amount of $91,000.

“This was a terrible, preventable tragedy that underscores the importance of OSHA’s standards. Employers are required to use equipment in accordance with manufacturer’s specifications,” said Barbara Theriot, OSHA’s area director in Kansas City, Mo. “Employers are responsible for identifying hazards, providing safety precautions such as guard rails and ensuring workers follow proper procedures to prevent injury or death.”

The 13 serious violations include: failing to guard open-sided floors throughout the plant with varying fall distances up to 20 feet; inadequate footing space on industrial ladders creating fall distances up to 125 feet; failing to inspect man lifts every 30 days; failing to have guarded belts and pulleys on machinery; failing to use proper connectors, thus exposing workers to electrical conductors on motors; failing to have two exit doors; obstructed exits; unmarked and poorly lighted exit routes; and failing to have an alarm system to warn workers of fires and other emergencies.

All of these citations would have been easy to correct and could have saved an employee’s life. And the cost to fix these issues would have been virtually nothing. That is why it is important to have a qualified occupational safety and health auditing firm inspect your facility on a regular basis. A simply third party safety audit would have uncovered these problems in a matter of hours.

If you have any questions about third party safety audits, please contact us. And if you have anything to add about the importance of third party safety audits, please leave a comment.

Confined Space Permit Entry Systems and Signage

Posted on by
Twitt

Confined spaces pose a problem for employers in many fields. They come in all shapes and sizes, and no two confined spaces are exactly the same. Additionally, most confined spaces are associated with additional hazards, requiring additional scrutiny when creating plans for dealing with these spaces.

To help safety teams ensure their confined spaces are safely managed, OSHA created Standard 1910.146, which sets minimum standards for confined spaces and their associated permit entry systems, if required. But it is important to remember that just because you are compliant with this standard, that does not mean your confined space is fully compliant; as we mentioned earlier, there are often other standards which must be considered when creating a plan for a confined space and its associated permit entry system.

With all of this in mind, it is time to determine which sites in your facility qualify as confined spaces, and which of those require a permit entry system. To start, a confined space, according to OSHA, is: any space which meets the following 3 criteria: it is large enough and so configured that an employee can bodily enter and perform assigned work; has limited or restricted means for entry or exit (for example, tanks, vessels, silos, storage bins, hoppers, vaults, and pits are spaces that may have limited means of entry.); and is not designed for continuous employee occupancy.

Determining which areas fit these three criteria is easy; determining which require a permit entry system is less easy. You can review standard 1910.146 to see what system, if any, is required for your facility. But with all of the nuances associated with confined spaces, it is often more practical to consult a professional occupational safety and health consulting firm.

If you have any questions about confined spaces and permit entry systems or their required signage, please contact us. If you have anything to add about confined space permit entry systems and their associated signage, please leave a comment.